2013/12/10 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> > E.g. seamark:type=harbour is fine for a seamark indicating a harbour, but > it isn't (IMHO) a nice tag for the harbour itself.
it seems though, that what is currently done is exactly this: add seamark:type=harbour to the whole area of the harbour: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:seamark:type%3Dharbour It also seems odd to add all facilities as attributes to the main object rather than mapping them inside the area at the place where they are (if I understood that page right, the former is what it suggests). E.g. Wi-Fi harbour:wifi Availability of WiFi access point. Drinking Water harbour:water_tap Availability of potable water. Showers harbour:showers Availability/access of shower/bathing facilities. Toilets harbour:toilets Availability/access of toilet facilities. Laundrette harbour:laundrette Availability/access of laundry facilities. why should we use a different tag for a wifi or a toilet because it is inside a harbour? We already have standard tags for those objects, duplicating the information seems strange to me, like a "parallel project inside the project". As this seems a general problem with openseamap tags, I suggest to involve also the tagging ML (cc.). This was already mentioned years ago but apparently it didn't change until now. cheeers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
