On 13 December 2013 19:37, Pee Wee <piewi...@gmail.com> wrote: > We want to thank all the contributors to this discussion. We think and > hope we have enough information to work on new proposal.
Thank you for not giving up, and for trying to improve the proposal. I think many of the no-votes were the result of a lack of understanding. Perhaps it would be good to find a couple of real-world illustrations, and for each of them explain the legal situation, the desired behaviour of the router, the current tagging situation, and one (or more) proposed tagging schemes. Then you can show how the current tagging does not allow desired routing in all cases, and how proposed tagging schemes do or not not allow for a better routing. One of the things I was not convinced about in the previous vote is the legal situation of cycling on roads next to a compulsory cycleway (in various jurisdictions), and in particular whether or not it is legal to use the main road to make a turn. Perhaps you can try to clarify this with reference to law texts, opinions of experts, and examples? -- Matthijs _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
