2013/12/17 fly <[email protected]> > On 17.12.2013 00:30, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > 2013/12/16 Fabrizio Carrai <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > highway=pedestrian (like a square) > > > > > > > > You will have to add area=yes to the relation I believe, even though it > > is already clear from the relation type that this is an area, but > > otherwise you'll get rendering problems (maybe a bug). > > Come on ! > Do not tag for the renderer ! > This is a major bug of the renderer at least with multipolygones which > are always areas but also with a lot of tags and closed ways which do > not make sense been interpreted as a closed line but no an area. > > > > Anyway, I don't think the pedestrian tag is suitable for this particular > > relation with these members. The green areas, some if them with dense > > vegetation cover, aren't a pedestrian space like the paved parts are. > > +1 >
As I wrote in my other message, indeed you can walk almost everywhere, so highway=pedestrian and area=yes make sense to me. > > > tourism=yes > > > > > > > > that doesn't make much sense, maybe the intention is to tag > > tourism=attraction? > > +1 > My fault: I was going to add other tags, that I didn't. Changed to attraction.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
