On 01/19/2014 07:23 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > On 2014-01-19 18:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2014/1/19 Colin Smale <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> The standard sign for "no vehicles" (red ring on white >> background) does not apply to bicycles being pushed by hand, >> but as a bicycle is technically a vehicle whether it is being >> ridden or not, there are some esoteric edge cases in the "no >> vehicles" category, like "no vehicles carrying explosives". If >> your bike carrier is full of Semtex, dismounting is IMHO not >> enough to allow you to pass the sign. >> >> I'd tag this a "no explosives" rather than "no bike with explosives" > By the way, w.r.t. the explosives business, "no explosives" would not > be right either, as the sign only applies to vehicles (which includes > cycles) and does not prohibit you from carrying them on foot. You just > dump the bike and put the Semtex in your rucksack. Then you are no > longer a vehicle.
Openstreetmap routing for cyclist suicide bombers - interesting niche but user retention is going to suck !
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
