> Am 19/gen/2014 um 19:23 schrieb Colin Smale <[email protected]>:
>
> Bottom line - we need a distinction between the vehicle (cycle) and the
> activity (cycling).
>
yes, as others have mentioned, there was recently a discussion about this on
tagging. the wiki defines "bicycle" as a legal tag for cycling, so for bringing
the object bicycle without using it there should be a new tag.
> A similar discussion has also been going on recently about PSVs - buses,
> taxis etc. The vehicle may be subject to different restrictions according to
> the activity - a bus (vehicle) being used for something other than a local
> scheduled service (activity) might not be allowed to use a bus lane for
> example.
>
+1. If you stick to the wiki then bus is to be used only for buses in public
service.
> By the way, w.r.t. the explosives business, "no explosives" would not be
> right either, as the sign only applies to vehicles (which includes cycles)
> and does not prohibit you from carrying them on foot. You just dump the bike
> and put the Semtex in your rucksack. Then you are no longer a vehicle.
>
then this is a major difference between uk and continental Europe, as pushing a
bike you would not be considered a vehicle here, but a pedestrian in all
aspects.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
