It was a bit confusing to me, but tunnel=building_passage seems to be a better one than covered=yes for the situations when a highway is under a building. I think ideally such a building should be split giving the building a different layer than the highway. Strange enough the wiki says'' *The layer has to be the same as the building*.' Too bad JOSM keeps displaying validator warnings for these situations.
2014/1/23 Richard Z. <[email protected]> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:34:42PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Related, in cases where covered is used without a layer tag should > there be > > > a common node in the place the way is crossing the building boundary > in the > > > same way there are supposed to be common nodes when streams cross > > > riverbanks > > > or weirs? > > > > > > > > > IMHO there should always be a layer tag to store topology. > > there are many cases where you can not apply a layer tag meaningfully. > There > is a way going through a building - which means the building is on both > sides > of the way, above the way and supposedly also some underground levels > bellow > the way. > > Richard > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
