On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 01:53:48PM +0100, nounours77 wrote: > > > I have significantly changed > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hot_Spring > > with the intention to revive the proposal - thanks for any comments and > > enhancments. > > > Dear Richard, > > thanks for your initiative. I agree with your arguments why a specific tag > "natural=hot_spring" is better than "natural=spring" and "temp=*". It is > something different. > > Not sure about the word "consistence" which looks strange to me (but I'm not > native). And also not very sure about the values: E.g. "mineral" - every > spring contains minerals, the interesting point is which and how much. > "sulfuric" - just a special case of "mineral" - why pick this one and not the > others
forgotten to answer this detail.. sulfuric may be a special case of mineral but the difference is very characteristic. I am in favor of mapping the most characteristic water properties first and possibly more detailed chemical composition as far as known and somehow important. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
