On 2014-03-13 15:17, Jo wrote : > What do you mean by 'factorize'? The same as Sylvain Letuffe and Albert Einstein ;-) ab+ac=a×(b+c) a is a multiple common factor that is expressed only once. It is the street name that can be alongside each number or only once in the relation. Понимаешь? ;-)
Cheers, André. > Jo > > > 2014-03-13 15:00 GMT+01:00 André Pirard <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > Hi, > > How great to finally more than an empty page > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet> !!! > But now, if that relation factorizes (2) "street name" shouldn't > it factorize addr: city, country, postcode too? > Shouldn't those keys be allowed in the relation? > Shouldn't those who know the deep secrets of that relation write > that down in this page instead of various messages I see? > > But I have a little problem here > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176885423>. > addr:housenumber is on a node. > If the relation contains > > * Way Le Théâtre à Denis (176885423) > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176885423> as house > * Node 1873693518 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1873693518> > as house > > JOSM diagnoses > "Member for role house of wrong type" - Role verification problem > 2 objects: Rue Sainte-Marguerite, Le Théâtre à Denis > > Now if I remove the second member (1), JOSM diagnoses *2 problems*: > House number without street > "Member for role house of wrong type" - Role verification problem > 2 objects: Rue Sainte-Marguerite, Le Théâtre à Denis > > (1) the role is "house" but the descriptive comment very vaguely, > tersely and strangely describes it as "one or more house numbers" > which is logical. > Should I assume that "house" is a misnomer, that it means > "address" and that I need only the node? > > (2) After having received the message below, quoting the worst > written article of all the wiki, always invoked without > justifications, saying that "I have not understood" that > relations are not made to factorize tags of all members, I am > surprised to see associatedStreet factorize the "street" tag of > all of its "house" members. > Who did not understand? > A relation, whatever its type but probably not associatedStreet, > could as well factorize a speed limit or any zone. > > Cheers, > > André. > > > On 2012-11-22 01:34, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote : >> Hi, >> >> Le mercredi 21 novembre 2012 22:53:53, A.Pirard.Papou a écrit : >>> Look at multilinestring, which I see as a swiss-knife way assembly. >>> >>> In my mind, such a relation is the way to assign the same tags to a >>> collection of objects making a whole with regard to those tags. If we >>> add recursion (nesting), which is very easy to do, that's powerful. >> You misunderstood the idea/goal behind the multilinestring proposal. It >> wasn't >> created to factorize tags of all members. It was used to record one real >> life >> feature made of 2 or more OSM way objects. (like a long river, a >> boundary >> between two countries all made of hundreds of ways) >> >> A key sentence has been added to avoid using it badly : >> >> "Do not use it to group loose ways : >> Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories >> (like all path in a forest) Example : if the name is not the same for >> all >> those ways, then you'd better not use this relation" >> >> What you are looking for is a category thing to group "loose ways" >> sharing a >> common property but relation weren't made for that : >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
