I've been experimenting with wikidata tagging in OSM a bit lately. One doubt I have is when tagging tombstones with subject:wikidata. Is that correct? Normally that one is used when an artistic image is made of someone. What if it's a family grave with more than one 'subject'? What if it's only the tombstone that was possibly moved in the mean time? So not the actual burial place anymore?
I do think it's important to be specific and quite a few of our OSM objects have several references to Wikidata. What I found though, is that it seems like it's necessary to create an article on at least one WP, to make it possible to have a notable Wikidata entry. This is not as easy as it seems with all the rules concerning living people and notability of the Wikipedias. So maybe notability on Wikidata should be expanded to all objects that we might want to map on OSM. i.e. if it's physical, it can have a qualifier in Wikidata. It is further complicated by the lack of freedom of panorama in Belgium and France, otherwise it would be enough to add pictures of the objects to Commons and create a category for them. (statues and buildings which don't get their own WP pages for example) Polyglot 2014-04-02 12:08 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > 2014-04-02 10:47 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić <[email protected]>: > > I think these tags are essential because the wikidata tag should be used >> very carefully. People are probably going to start tagging McDonalds >> restaurants with wikidata=Q38076 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q38076>. >> That is (maybe not so obviously) wrong because that little restaurant isn't >> a multinational company. It's a restaurant that uses their franchise. >> >> That's why there should be several predefined tags so we don't end up >> with lots of bad data. >> >> operator:wikidata is better IMHO because you can also have >> operator:source, operator:webpage, and it makes more sense to do it in that >> order. >> > > > +1 > Still in the case of a Franchise operator:wikidata would not be McDonald's > Corp. but the company that operates the small restaurant (sometimes it is > McD, but mostly not). > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
