On 21/04/2014 21:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-04-21 20:48 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:> Without any additional tags like "tunnel=*" or "covered=*", a > "layer=-1" river shouldn't be rendered differently than a "layer=1" or > even in the absence of any "layer" tag. This is a bug in OsmAnd. You except for the the very frequent case when the river with a layer=-1 goes through a landuse=* area with a layer=0.+1, as soon as there is any other object on a different layer, be it landuse, a place area or something else, with the lower layer tag you are excluding the river from this feature and putting it below.
I'm genuinely surprised how a relatively simple tag can cause such confusion amongst experienced mappers. The above is an example of incorrect tagging & therefore should be fixed. However, on saying that, it doesn't mean that it will automatically be rendered as such. As has been said many times previously it is just a *guide* for the renderer, who, as with Mapnik, will ignore the layer=* tags in that example & let common sense prevail.
Dave F. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
