On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just thought of this: since a node can belong to multiple networks (cycling, > walking, equestrian), we need a tagging scheme for the network name that > takes this into account. > So something like : network:rcn:name, network:rwn:name and network:ren:name
No, the tags on the node should be moved to the appropriate route relation where you also set the network_:name. > both rcn and rwn are already used in the numbering of the nodes (rwn_ref, > rcn_ref). I'm not familiar with the equestrian networks Is this question related to the "network" relation ? > Another problem is for routes that form the connection between 2 networks. > Right now, they are placed in the 2 network relations. How would you tag the > network names for them ? Create two route relations, one per network. Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
