2014-07-25 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]>: > I propose to reduce inventing new landuses and start making subcategories > whenewer possible. > > Recently I encountered landuse=plant_nursery, landuse=salt_pond, > landuse=greenhouse_horticulture and landuse=mine. > > I think that all of them are overly specific and should be tagged as > subcategories > of more general landuses. > > [landuse=plant_nursery] (x4398) -> [landuse=farmland, > farmland=plant_nursery] (x980) > [landuse=salt_pond] (x4445) -> [landuse=industrial, industrial=salt_pond] > (x59) > [landuse=greenhouse_horticulture] (x19478) -> [landuse=farmland, > farmland=greenhouse_horticulture] (unused) > [landuse=mine] (x1005) -> [landuse=industrial, industrial=mine] (unused) >
I partly agree. plant_nursery could indeed become a subtag of farmland, as could be greenhouse horticulture, but I do agree less for mining and salt_pond. landuse=mine is in line with landuse=quarry (for open pit mining it might be a subgroup of quarry?). salt_ponds could also be considered a subtype of farmland (maybe depends on the case/scale). cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
