2014-09-22 13:47 GMT+02:00 Mishari Muqbil <[email protected]>: > I realise that it's my fault for not being very clear from the beginning. > I think as John mentions, amenity=soapland is about right. I do suspect > that the establishments in Thailand are based on the same concept as those > which exist in Japan. >
That being the case I'd say they really do qualify as amenity=brothel. It doesn't really matter that they're not officially brothels, or don't label themselves as such, that doesn't change the fact. Nor should you be liable in any way for mapping facts. However, amenity=soapland would be more precise and give more information, and there's also a decent Wikipedia page about it. I'd say it's really a sub group/type of amenity=brothel though. -- Guttorm
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
