It's not uncommon that actually the brand (e.g. Texaco) is being used on either operator, or brand, or name. Only the latter is rendered, which can be logical as in common speaking one easily says: I'll fill my car up at the next Texaco' rather than saying 'I'll fill my car up at the fuel station of Mr. xxx'
Due to the current Mapnik rendering I often use name where it's actually the brand (yeh, I know, it's tagging for the renderer) 2014-09-25 4:34 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson <[email protected]>: > I'm pretty sure operator=Batman wouldn't work for name=Batman's Good Food, > which is brand=Phillips 66... > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Richard Welty <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> On 09/24/2014 10:22 AM, Philip Barnes wrote: >> >>> Besides in my experience petrol stations do have a name, it may not be >>> obvious until you are close to the shop. Other than supermarket petrol >>> stations, the name of the petrol station will appear on your receipt, not >>> the name of the oil company. Phil (trigpoint) >>> >> >> true, but are we better off with that in operator= than in >> name= ? >> >> richard >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
