2014-10-16 8:33 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: > It seems that are serious problems with this tag, is there somebody > interested in > this topic who want to make a better proposal? > > (1) This tag can not be used on the same object as > historic=archaeological_site - > despite the fact that many archaeological sites are excavated tombs. > > (2) There is no clear limit for notability, most likely this tag will be > in future used to > describe any grave. Even now, some people are using it this way. The same > happened with natural=tree - originally defined as "lone or significant > tree". > > (3) There is no proposed tag to use for ordinary grave, further encuraging > using this tag in way other than defined. >
There are used these two http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tomb and http://taginfo.osm.org/tags/cemetery=grave#overview The first is a structured proposal, the second is just used.... > see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dtomb > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
