2014-10-16 16:14 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com>:
> In addition to tomb=* and cemetery=grave, there's also this proposal: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Grave > > The proposal states it is "mainly for [graves] without historic value" > Thank you for pointing to this. It seems strange to add the "grave:" prefix to all keys, e.g. "ref", "inscription" etc. because typically you can get this context by the object to which a tag is applied to. If this context is not clear from the mapping than this is usually a sign that there is some problem in the mapping (several entities mixed up into one osm object). I do not understand the "mainly for graves without historic value" part. Does this exclude graves with historic value, or is it simply a hint that there are far more graves for ordinary people than there are for famous ones? cheers, Martin PS: Usage of the cemetery=grave tag should be discouraged: single graves aren't subtypes of cemeteries (and we shouldn't encourage different tagging schemes for graves on cemeteries and graves on churchyards, at least IMHO).
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
