2014-10-10 19:13 GMT+02:00 sabas88 <[email protected]>: > I use > amenity=drinking_water + drinkable=no >
I agree with your own judgement that this is nonesense ;-) IMHO we shouldn't tag like this. This is not really comparable to entrance=exit (as any exit physically might be used as an entrance as well, while drinking water is about water that is drinkable (implying more than once)). Also agree with Tobias, a water_tap would better fit into amenity. Frankly, I believe water_tap is too generic given that we already have established amenity=drinking_water for water taps that do emit drinking water. At this point if you don't want to create conflicts with existing tagging scheme, a water tap emitting water that is not drinkable (i.e. the stuff that remains for tagging when all taps with drinking water are tagged differently) could get a tag like amenity=raw_water or industrial_water. I would believe it is also highly unprobable that there will be a water tap for sewage water (there might be closures / valves of course, but this will likely not be something that we'll map, or if we did, it will be a subtag in some wastewater treatment / sewage tagging system and not in amenity=*). cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
