Hallo, Di 04.11.2014 09:03 Martin Vonwald <[email protected]>: > On the other hand, if we are looking at junctions with multiple (turning) lanes and multiple > cycle lanes, then we should use the :lanes tagging in addition(!) to the good old cycleway > tagging.
+1. That seem a like good solution. But it still doesn't help me documenting "Schutzstreifen" (aka soft_lane). Mo 03.11.2014 20:18 fly <[email protected]>: > Either just let your proposal exist and start using it or simply use the lanes:-tagging like > > biycle:lanes=yes|yes|designated Can I do that, even if the proposal was rejected? It would leave the problem that no one (Routers, Renderes) would use it and it will probably often be changed either to cw=lane or to cw=shared_lane, depending on the mappers preferences. Regards Hubert. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
