> we are talking about "part of" I think we can use this in definition, but lets wait for Dmitry. Here is my point:
Definition: (required, must be tagged) kids_area=* - used for areas dedicated for kids within bigger facilities (restaurants, fast_foods, hotels, hospitals, airports, shops) (required, but can be untagged) with opening_hours (defined by specific shop or parent building=* opening hours), (required, but can be untagged) with limited maxstay (see also opening_hours) (recommendation) usually with richer or fragile toys or equipment that cannot be found at regular leisure=playground, (recommendation) almost always indoor (this is 100% true for some countries, but we should let other countries with less demanding climate be more flexible about this tag. If we define it as "always indoor" there will be people who will simply remove this tag because proposal said this MUST be indoor) You cannot imply opening_hours or maxstay tags because their value will be different from place to place. 2014-12-19 17:09 GMT+04:00 Martin Vonwald <[email protected]>: > > > > 2014-12-19 14:05 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]>: >> >> -1, there is no reason to tag two identical playgrounds (outdoor, >> standard set of playground toys) differently just because one >> is near mall and other not. >> > > You are right. But we are not talking about "near", we are talking about > "part of". This is relevant, for example a "playground" near a mall might > be accessible 24/7, but a playground in a mall only when the mall is also > open. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
