> state that one is outdoors, the other indoors We speak for new tags now. I don't want to touch old tagging schema (leisure=playground) with over 200K+ uses, there will be even more people who don't see need in kids_area=*.
> not convinced. "poor equipment" is not my experience for some places, this is really depending on the actual place (overall but not only country, also city and individual playground). Not truly poor, but you cannot afford TV at playground but you can afford TV for kids_area=yes. Not because you don't have money for TV but because you sane enough to keep TV, pencils, mats, fragile toys indoor. Is there better word to describe it instead of "poor"? You cannot use plastics and other fragile materials outdoor. We have -40C during winter even for our european part. Even when you use plastics outdoor, you will use not only low temp resistant, but also durable (by durable I mean near vandal resistant). > Not helpful for distinction It is not primary distinction but it might help you with particular object among others suggestions and pictures. > you would then tag the exact same feature with different main tags, if the operator is public or private? I'm sry, I meant "usually by local municipality" and "usually by commercial companies" here I don't think it is possible to define clear difference between hotels/motels or playgrounds/kids_area, but people prefer to classify them instead of distinguishing them by their individual properties (indoor-outdoor, fee-no fee, poor equipment-rich equipement, unclear ownership-most likely commercial company). Instead of 4 or 10 tags in OSM, real people use words: "детская площадка" (leisure=playground), "детская игровая комната"(kids_area=*) - this is much simpler and native way to map objects. This will work for short term, since we want to use kids_area. We cannot resolve/refine or define leisure=playground, this task is too heavyweight and out of this proposal. 2014-12-19 16:17 GMT+04:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > > 2014-12-19 13:07 GMT+01:00 Никита <[email protected]>: >> >> leisure=playground (usually outdoor), kids_area (almost always indoor, >> esp in Russia during winter) >> > > > why can't we get rid of the exceptions ("usually", "almost always") and > state that one is outdoors, the other indoors (if standalone), or one is > standalone, the other is part of another feature like a shop. > > > >> leisure=playground (poor equipment, often vandal resistant), kids_area >> (fragile or expensive equipment is not rare) >> > > > not convinced. "poor equipment" is not my experience for some places, this > is really depending on the actual place (overall but not only country, also > city and individual playground). > > > >> leisure=playground (almost never fee=yes), kids_area (it will cost you >> directly fee=yes or indirectly fee=no via your prices >> in restaurant/cafe/pub/stadium) >> > > > "almost never"=sometimes and indirect fees via prices means you only pay > if you buy something (i.e. fee=no). -> Not helpful for distinction > > > >> leisure=playground (provided by local municipality), kids_area often >> provided by commercial company (malls, private kindergartens, hotels) >> > > > you would then tag the exact same feature with different main tags, if the > operator is public or private? > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
