On 28/12/2014, Ole Nielsen / osm <[email protected]> wrote: > It depends. Sometimes it is useful to add this tag. I typically add it to > bidirectional cycle paths along roads as you would normally expect such > cycleways to be oneway. Adding a oneway=no indicates that it has been > surveyed and found to be bidirectional and will further prevent eager > mappers adding the "missing" oneway=yes tag to this cycleway.
Another usecase that was presented on the list at some stage is town centers that have more oneways than not (I think the example was in Spain). In that context, oneway=no is usefull for mappers. I'm sure that most foo=default_value tags are the result of cluelessness/mishaps, but it's not always the case. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
