On 15.01.2015 12:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > you could use polygons (e.g. 2 distinct multipolygons, one for each > address), and add a note to inform your fellow mapping colleagues that the > overlap is intended (note is not needed but nice).
That still separates the feature from its address, not in a topographical sense, but in the sense that tags for one feature are fragemented to multiple OSM objects. I wonder why multiple addresses are so loathed while multiple objects or even multiple relations for the same purpose are considered ok. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
