On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:53:13PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > you could use polygons (e.g. 2 distinct multipolygons, one for each > address), and add a note to inform your fellow mapping colleagues that the > overlap is intended (note is not needed but nice).
I think this solution has an essential advantage: distinct multipoligons with single addr:housenumbers can go do distinct associatedStreet relations. you can't do it with addrN:; and the mapper may want to use associatedStreet e.g. because it provides a way to specify parallel addresses in different languages (I believe, this feature is used in countries like Ukraine). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
