On 29/01/2015 12:28 AM, althio wrote:
removed:
(features that do not exist anymore or never existed but are commonly seen
on other sources)
I propose to remove the part "or never existed but are commonly seen on
other sources", because this has nothing to do with "removed". If people want
to tag easter eggs or errors
from other maps in the OSM db they should use a distinct tag for it.
I propose
error:
(features that do not exist but may be seen on other sources)
[generic, catchall for the two cases + leave a trace of the feature to
prevent edit war]
How about
phantom: .. ? Some of these may be deliberate so the copyright holder
can easily identify copies of their data. As such they are not errors
but deliberate.
removed:
(features that do not exist anymore but may still be seen on other sources)
[@Martin: leave a mention to the other sources]
I see no harm in leaving them in OSM. Untill something is built there or
the landuse/cover changes. Leave it there so no one re adds it. Remove
it only when new features take its place, so the new features are not
confused by the past.
eventually a third tag for:
(features that never existed but may be seen on other sources)
but two above may be enough.
Same as phantom?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
