On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 08:23 +1100, Warin wrote: > The 'amenity=waste_disposal does not look to have been through an > aproval process ... nor does any tag. The 'approval process' is > voluntary ..
Not sure I agree there ! There is an approval process, if a key/tag gets the votes OR its agreed thats its widely used, then its "officially approved". Complying with the standard so established is voluntary. I guess thats what you meant. But thats probably not important, lets concentrate on camp_site. Are you suggesting we should throw out whats there now and define some better terms ? As you point out, existing ones may not be 'official' and are not really a very good syntax. I'd personally like to make it a bit tidier but like Dave S, I'll go with the flow, as long as there is a flow ! For example, dump_point or dump_station is vastly preferable IMHO to a [amenity=waste_disposal; waste=chemical_toilet] combination. I think pitch v. campsite v. campground is lost, there are 56K uses of campsite. If I had time, I see how many are in the UK ! Interestingly, the tags we are discussing are not mentioned in camp_site combinations..... Incidentally, they use "pitch" as in "pitch a tent", I didn't get that. Personally, I'd only put a new tag on the wiki in a proposal page. If we agree, here, on things that work, I'd go that way. David _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
