On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 11:16 +0000, Dan S wrote: > However it occurs to me that it would be useful to have some way of > indicating _what_ it is the reception for.....
In a lot of cases, we'd probably see a larger area mapped as something, be it caravan park, mine, whatever. Then a single node within that space would represent the reception_desk. Clearly the larger area would not be tagged =reception desk would it ? The usefulness here it to identify where, in the larger area, the reception desk is. Hmm.... David > For example, if it was part > of a "site" relation*, then a role like role=reception would connect > it to the larger entity in a meaningful way. That might be a suggested > tagging option... > > Best > Dan > > > * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site > > > > 2015-02-06 2:03 GMT+00:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > Request for comment on new tag 'amenity=reception_desk' > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dreception_desk > > > > This comes out of the tag ON HT E tourism=camp_site WIKI PAGE which has a > > sub key of camp_site=reception. > > > > As 'Receptions' are numerous outside of camp sites I think it is best to > > have them available for use under other things - like hotels. So the new > > tag. > > > > 'reception_desk' .. should separate it from other types of receivers .. like > > radio receivers. > > > > Amenity is the best fit so amenity=reception_desk. > > > > what do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
