"access=no or access=private do not seem to make much sense" Toilet may be open only to to a limited public - in military base, only for employees or out of order.
2015-03-02 19:37 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > 2015-03-02 19:05 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]>: > >> I'm opening a discussion about at least mechanically re-tagging >> operator:type=private >> into "access=no" or "access=private", so that rendering software can >> choose to omit these locations depending on the map purpose. >> > > > according to the wiki, the tag amenity=toilets is for "a toilet open to > the public", so access=no or access=private do not seem to make much sense. > http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
