2015-03-20 21:59 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com>: > I have updated the proposal > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site%3D*> with > the feedback as much as possible. >
Appearantly there are already people using this key following a different scheme, (looks as if they used it to tag parts of camping sites rather than using this to specify a detailed subtypology, have a look at taginfo here: http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/camp_site . There are roughly 1,8K uses as of now, which is not very much but maybe not so few that we can completely ignore it. IMHO from a semantic point of view the tags in use do not make much sense, for example a reception can occur everywhere and it seems like a bad idea to have different tags according to which feature it provides. It seems logical for me to use the tag camp_site=* to specify subtypes of camp_sites, but it could also be "camp_site_type" if we wanted to avoid a conflict. Some values are documented here in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Camp_site I don't like the idea that a "designated" camp site has to be non-commercial, I'd rather tag that aspect with the "fee" key. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
