On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 09:42 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:11 PM, David Bannon wrote > > Are we better saying - > tourism=camp_site > toilets=yes > sanitary_dump_station=yes > amenity=showers > fee=yes > > Yes. > Because camp sites will defy categorization.
No, sorry, I don't think that works either ! Looking at a typical commercial book that describes camp sites, you expect to see a list, maybe a long one, things like toilets, water, showers, laundary, BBQ, fire place and so one. Many of these are already in amenity=*. But its silly to do on one node or area - tourism=camp_site name=Happy Campers Rest amenity=bbq amenity=fireplace amenity=bench amenity=waste_disposal So, I'd need to map each as an individual node. A search of the data will not necessarily associate the BBQ with Happy Campers Rest Caravan Park. Thats just as silly. Someone making a map wants to see one object with these attributes so they can decide what to render and how to render it. tourism=camp_site:amenity=bbq;fireplace;drinking_water;waste_disposal;toilets;showers;bench name=Happy Camper Rest Ugly but works in terms of associating the data in a meaningful way. I think we still need categories in some form so that renders have a hint of what they should do. David > > > But definitely add "official" there, or a least "operator". I want to > know in advance if the tent symbol on the map represents a place > I can comfortably stay without getting woken up at 5am by a farmer > with a shotgun * > > > -Bryce > > > * Been there, done that. > > > ** Also add "stay_limit=7 nights", "internet_access=wlan", > "camp_host=no", "network=", "campfire_permitted=season", > "ranger_programs", "website". > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging