On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote:
> Scout camps ARE landmarks often, and valid destinations, even if they > don't offer services to the general public. This is not an argument to map it as tourism=camp_site, this is just a argument to map it. While I agree with the latter (mapping it), I wonder whether there are enough similarities with other camp sites to map them as tourism=camp_site Right now I have the impression that every new tag has to be super general and that you need to add dozens of extra tags to understand what you are actually talking about. ( a bit exaggerated, I know). When you make a map to show all camp sites, are you interested in showing the scout camps ? I doubt so. Why not just map it as leisure/tourism/... = scout_camp ? What's wrong with that ? regards m
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
