On 3/04/2015 5:05 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Scout camps ARE landmarks often, and valid destinations, even if
they don't offer services to the general public.
This is not an argument to map it as tourism=camp_site, this is just a
argument to map it. While I agree with the latter (mapping it), I
wonder whether there are enough similarities with other camp sites to
map them as tourism=camp_site
Right now I have the impression that every new tag has to be super
general and that you need to add dozens of extra tags to understand
what you are actually talking about. ( a bit exaggerated, I know).
When you make a map to show all camp sites, are you interested in
showing the scout camps ? I doubt so.
Why not just map it as leisure/tourism/... = scout_camp ? What's wrong
with that ?
Wrong? Nothing I can see.
Best? Another question.
Some want top down tagging. Some want tags for green sheep with 6 legs.
What is best? Without a general statement of what is preferable no one
has any basis for a decision.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
