> Am 22.05.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>: > > Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the > water is agitated. maybe this is a language issue, I would have thought they would reflect anyway but you wouldn't see a clear picture (I agree that reflection_pool is not the right term nonetheless, nor does the wiki suggest so) > >> Maybe water=cascade could be the right fit. > > Probably, but I'd like more opinions; and other options - cascades are > just one example. what are the other examples? We cannot propose tags if you don't say what you want to tag ;-) cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- [Tagging] Water featuers Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Warin
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuer Janko Mihelić
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Janko Mihelić
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Richard Z.
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... John F. Eldredge
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Richard Z.
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Dave Swarthout
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Dave Swarthout
- Re: [Tagging] Water feat... Richard Z.