> >> >> > The function is akin to car parking and bicycle parking. Sticking with > that theme, we'd get dog parking and horse parking. A sign labelled 'dog > park' tagged as dog parking has obvious links but the to tag a dog park > sign with 'hitching rail' breaks the similarity - a similarity that would > be language-independent on the basis that the 'park' part appears in both. > It might be appropriate to go for: > > amenity=animal_parking > dog_parking=yes > horse_parking=no > > so that animal parking that accepts different sized animals can be tagged > at one node with the use of subtags. > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
<sarcasm> so I can retag a veterinary with amenity=doctors, pet=yes, human=no ? an off-leash area for dogs with leisure=playground, dog=yes, child=no ? The serve the same purpose, not ? </sarcasm> Generalization is fine (sometimes), but this proposal is over the top IMHO. regards m
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
