On 29 May 2015 at 10:56, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:33 AM, pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Did you ever look at the example that I've send you ? (probably not >>> because it doesn't fit in your idea of addresses) >>> >> >> Probably ! >> >> >>> The house numbers are used to identity flats, not the building. >>> >> >> Now you're confusing 'house numbers' with flat numbers ! >> > > No, they are not flat numbers. see > http://osm.org/go/0EpD1Xa_M?m=&relation=3899303 > They are just a continuation from the numbers you see to the north. Number > 9 does not exist. There is no common number to refer to the building. > > Similarly in the Eduard Anseelestraat they just continue from the 89 to > the east and are followed by the house with number 107 to the west. > > Sorry that the Belgian reality does not fit into your world model. >
I know of buildings where the flat numbers are continuations of house numbers. It's not a big deal for me. Actually, the one I'm thinking of are not flats but apartments. 2 storey apartments, 4 storey building. -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
