> On May 30, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > > But if not, we have no system, just historical cases and a lot of exceptions. > I think it's time to try to make some rules instead.
I though there was some tag prefix like disused: or abandoned: that could be used with the building=industrial to note what its original purpose was for. Maybe you are just supposed to use building=church and shop=poodles for a church that was converted into a poodle shop - but i imagine that would be only if it was really really obvious that it was a church, not just by its shape, but by the presence of original fixtures and ornamental architecture - not just that it has a steeple on one side. There has to be some threshold - there are Hundreds and hundreds of 7-11s that closed in Japan that are now repurposed - but you know exactly that it was a 7-11 based on architecture alone - but i don't feel tagging building=convenience_store + shop=poodles on it helps anyone. Javbw _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
