sent from a phone
> Am 17.06.2015 um 03:18 schrieb Warin <[email protected]>: > > Response; > a) OSM already has furniture. It exists and is of use. It should be mapped. agree that who wants could map furniture as well, but that would not be "amenity" and I would not care about such a tag and it would not be the main tag for the reception function > b) One could then map a very large area .. including the waiting area, the > entire building? What is needed is the small area where you go to get > access/information. it can be easily decided by the mapper what makes most sense for the actual situation > c) And there was a dog_bin in use in OSM too.. one could assume that it is > for dead dogs? The present reception_area use is all on nodes, no areas at > all. There are less than 110 uses of it. There is no documentation for it. > One of the tag is for a building .. on a node. there are more than 30 times reception_area tags compared to reception_desk, but both numbers are low > d) I personally know of two places where the reception is a long way from the > main entrance (Australia). Someone else also know of a reception a long way > from the main entrance (Africa I think). So not always at the main entry, and > in that situation mapping it is very usefull. +1, if someone thinks a tag is not needed he should not vote, because voting is about a concrete tag and which tag is best to describe something cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
