On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:20:50AM -0700, geow wrote: > geow > dieterdreist wrote > > sent from a phone > > > > Am 05.08.2015 um 12:03 schrieb Richard < > > > ricoz.osm@ > > > >: > > > >> In 2008 highway=path > >> was approved saying > >> "The default access restriction of highway=path is open > >> to all non-motorized vehicles, but emergency vehicles are allowed. " > >> Some years later, Feb 15 2015 the page was changed without vote and > >> discussion > >> to claim that : > >> "The default access restrictions of paths varies from country, see > >> OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions" > > > > should be reverted. If I had my way we'd remove all conflicting country > > specific docu from the wiki in one go ;-) > > > > cheers > > Martin > > The essential path attribute "open to all non-motorized vehicles" is > untouched by my edit to the wiki and emergency vehicles are allowed anyway > and anywhere if applicable.
the page you linked to says otherwise. The result is same as if you had written the wrong information yourself. > Actually from country to country this rule is *restricted or extended* for > other means of transportation. I'm well aware that Austria bans bicycles > from paths and even tracks (!) in forestry lands by default if not otherwise > permitted or signposted. In other parts of the world i.e. in Nepal > motorcycles are used and allowed on paths between mountain villages. Legal > access restrictions should always be tagged properly on the individual way. there might be space for additional specifications that do not contradict the approved proposal but not anything that contradicts 7 years of approved tagging. The bicycles are the problem here and the talkpage of "OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions" list other problems. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
