On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 13:57:47 +0200 > Richard <ricoz....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Imo *=designated and *=permissive also imply infomration about > > suitability. > > Typically it is true - but in theory something may be legally cycleway > and unsuitable for cyclists. It would be bicycle=designated (but it is > mostly theory, I am unaware about any real example). All examples presume the way is pointing away from the camera. OK, here's one for a (rather regionally common but otherwise rare) example of multiple lanes explicitly designated for bicycles in each direction. highway=tertiary bicycle=designated bicycle:lanes:forward=designated|designated bicycle:lanes:backward=designated|designated http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/2uo21bX7_QTp8wtdN_J92Q/photo Here's a little more germain example from further up (away from downtown) the same bicycle boulevard. highway=tertiary bicycle=designated lanes:forward=2 turn:lanes:forward=left| bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|designated lanes:backward=1 bicycle:lanes:backward=designated http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/aCMWyhAE8Ot7McIhcCZxtA/photo Bonus round from yet further up: highway=tertiary bicycle=designated cycleway=lane parking:lanes:right=parallel (after the parking restriction sign at least; before that it's fire_lane) parking:lanes:left=no_stopping (signs facing away from camera) lanes:forward=2 motor_vehicle:lanes:forward=yes|no bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|designated lanes:backward=2 motor_vehicle:lanes:backward=yes|no bicycle:lanes:backward=yes|designated
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
