Would you still use building=civic for power utility offices when it's a commercial company ? The power distribution in Belgium is complex. The network is ran/owned by a government institution, the actual power distribution by commercial providers. So when you want a contract to get electricity you go to a commercial entity. So building=civic is not suitable there (I think)
regards On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:42 AM, johnw <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 3, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Joan <[email protected]> wrote: > > The tag has already been used a few times (there was four tags in > different places of the world) see it here > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/office=power_utility#overview, > Its counterpart, the water_utility has 35 ocurrences in the map > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/office=water_utility#overview > > 2015-10-24 0:22 GMT+02:00 Joan <[email protected]>: > >> This is a proposal for tagging power utility offices, >> > > I wanted a landuse=civic (or similar) to go with building=civic - and have > a civic=* subkey to define all the various governmental and civic offices. > (townhalls, community centeres, tax offices, water district offices, etc. > > I would like to actually have something more umbrellaish than doing these > one office at a time and coming up and doing voting for each one. we need > each one, so lets make a subkey and define them all. the different utilitiy > offices (which are usually state run, or state sanctioned monopolies for > basic services) can easily be added. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic > > Javbw > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
