On 10/01/2016 8:55 PM, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Dave Swarthout wrote
Haha, welcome to the club. This is a problem everyone faces. Here in
Thailand I spend a lot of time breaking up large wood multipolygons
because
in the early days folks did not take the time to do it right. Woods do not
cover highways (unless its a farm track) nor do they cover water features
like river valleys or reservoirs. I can tell you this, it's a lot of work
either way you decide to do it but future mappers will thank you if you do
it properly in the first place.
Oh, yes, I also have that problem with natural=wood polygons, often
containing
nearly 2000 nodes and typically completely wrong (according to the
ortorectified GSI images),
covering large parts of residential areas, farmland, water, and so on.
In my eyes landuse or natural polygons should never be that
complex, when I create one with more than 100 nodes I start
feeling uncomfortable.
:-D Come to Australia...
Stuart national Park covers over 340,000 hectares .. most of its boundaries are
orthogonal though..
Kosciuszko National Park covers about 690,000 hectares (1.5 million aces) ...
has a very crinkly boundary!
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
