Florian Lohoff-2 wrote > Also there are much more fine grained tags for agricultural land e.g. > meadow etc - Typically when you map farmland and do it right it does not > grow that huge. You have small wooden strips, waterways with > scrub around, roads etc. I typically even break up at field boundaries > seen in differences in plant growths etc as thats typically the > boundary for changes in usage in the future.
Sure, one can always do better. Let's look at two ways that I created yesterday: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390575189 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390575208 One may as well combine both ways or create > 30 smaller areas, each with different details, add ditches and so on. My goal is to more to improve routing, I map large farmland areas to reduce completely white (unmapped) areas. Anyway, if I got that right my approach is okay for me as well as for future mappers, so thanks for the feedback to anyone. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/landuse-farmland-and-highway-track-tp5864502p5864594.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
