Now THAT I didn't see coming! Is this an alternative to add into the mix? If it was working at an API level, I am curious what considerations led to the decision to actively remove it in API0.6.
--colin On 2016-01-27 19:45, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Colin Smale wrote: > >> If we were looking at this problem as if we were >> designing OSM on a clean whiteboard > > When OSM was first designed on a clean whiteboard[1], multiple values were > in fact possible. An object could have > > name=Bridge Street > name=Banbury Road > > and the API was happy - though, in practice, no (/very little) software > supported it. > > This ability was only removed in API 0.6: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-January/033437.html > > Richard > > [1] beer mat > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-Remove-name-1-and-alt-name-1-from-wiki-tp5865654p5866023.html > Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
