Today: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/sloped_kerb&diff=1279361&oldid=1215962
On 7 March 2016 at 19:48, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > Recently I believe in this case was 2010 . > > Simon > > Am 07.03.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Andy Mabbett: >> On 2 March 2016 at 16:42, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >>> While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't say >>> anything about the other variant because of the lacking documentation, I >>> don't really care either way, it would simply make easier if we could >>> come to some consensus on what the actual current state is and what the >>> preferred tagging is. >> I notice that two pages have recently been marked as "deprecated", in favour >> of: >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb >> >> I find the latter unhelpful; it assumes that all wheelchairs are the >> same, and seems to leave no way to say that a kerb is "dropped" (using >> whatever term may be preferred), if the editor does not know which >> /type/ of dropped kerb it is. >> >> I would prefer, say: >> >> kerb=dropped >> dropped-kerb=rolled >> >> instead of, say: >> >> kerb=rolled >> >> since the former allows the use of: >> >> kerb=dropped >> >> alone. >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
