On 19 March 2016 at 17:47, John Willis <jo...@mac.com> wrote: >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: >> >> It's nowhere near as ridiculous as trying to render them according to >> some arbitrary and subjective "importance" (Importance to whom? > > All of the examples I have given are all sourced in local culture. > > Usually having things named after it, noted on road signs, depicted in > paintings, noted in historical documents, included in historic lists (of > famous peaks), and other *easily understood* things that provincial or > regional people would be able to define - but be extremely difficult for a > person who doesn't live in the country or region (or speak the language) to > verify.
So far as "importance is concerned, that's not "sourced", that's your *subjective* interpretation. > an argument against subjective data You have yet to give evidence that there is any subjective data relating to the very vague concept of "importance". -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
