2016-06-27 11:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer <[email protected]>: > No. amenity=social_facility is a success story of structured tagging, and > nursing_home -> social_facility shows in Mathias Dahl excellent tag > migration > analysis [1] as the tag with the highest transition count, thus excellent > acceptance among mappers. > > A nursing home is indeed a social facility, and with the sub-tags of > social_facility=* and social_facility:for=* you can specify quite > precisely what type it is and who it is provided for. >
for nursing homes it doesn't (yet) seem to be a success story, there are only (or at least there are) 12 social_facility=nursing_home but 11899 amenity=nursing_home. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/social_facility#values I am not against the idea to use social facility tagging for nursing homes, I just think it should be its own value in "social_facility" and not mistagged as group home. +1 to social_facility=nursing_home Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
