On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:49 AM, markus schnalke <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So, if mapping sidewalks is a lot of effort (kerbs and such), there > will be few motivation to do it at all. Having it as trivial as > possible increases the probability of users doing it. > > I tested out the proposed mapping/tagging scheme in my local area ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/40.49192/-105.05655 - not claiming I did it perfectly). I didn't think it was especially difficult. Drawing the additional ways took a little more time, but offered the advantage that you received a good visual as to whether all the sidewalks had been correctly mapped. > > I'd suggest to keep both possibilities: simple/basic mapping and > complex/sophisticated mapping of sidewalks, thus letting the mappers > choose what is more appropriate in the specific case. > I am not opposed to keeping both. Probably obvious, but we should probably state that the two should not co-exist on the same street segment. Mike T (osm: tekim)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
