On 08/08/2016 21:43, Meg Drouhard wrote:

We've been drafting a longer response that we wanted to share with everyone to give more context (for those also following the import list-serve, there is a separate post there that goes through import-specific challenges). ...


Hi,

Thanks for this. I had a go at using "separate ways" to describe the situation in a small area here:

http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/54.0092/-1.0546

(turn the data layer on or edit it to see it, obviously). some of the infrastructure was already mapped "separately" and that was just copied from OSM to the api06 server)

By doing that, a couple of points became very clear:

1) It's actually quite time-consuming to do this (as expected, as there's more data to be added, and care needs to be taken to see where there are actually dropped kerbs and where there aren't. Quite a few of the useful sidewalk to road accesses here are former house and field access; it's doubtful whether even the canonical local authority map has them.

2) There are a few major "blockers" to wheeled access in this area, and I'm not sure how best to represent some of them:

One (the lack of dropped kerbs northbound on http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/way/4301670266#map=19/54.01168/-1.05244&layers=D ) is straightforward. The others are less so:

http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/way/4301669135#map=19/54.00464/-1.05499&layers=D

Here the fences designed to slow down suicidal cyclists are wide enough to accommodate a mobility scooter, but there's so much traffic on the road that, unless it's gridlocked or 3am in the morning an unaccompanied mobility scooter user would struggle to cross here*. I don't really see how we can (or even if we should) capture that in OSM.

http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/way/4301709029#map=19/54.01155/-1.05757&layers=D

Here (and I've drawn it from memory rather than survey, so it might not be in quite the right place) there's a gap that's too small for mobility scooters, not because it's not wide enough, but because the right angles close together make it impossible to negotiate. "maxwidth" or "maxwidth:physical" doesn't really work here; any suggestions?

Also - can anyone suggest a router (online or off) that could work with this data? Also, what about "this road is too busy to cross unless gridlocked" information?

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse)

* source is my father, who lives round here.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to