On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:15:16AM +0200, ksg wrote: > > > Am 06.09.2016 um 09:44 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > > > 2016-09-03 14:46 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > Are there any objections to make clear on the cave entrance page that > > "name" on a cave entrance object is the name of the cave entrance? > > > > > > Thank you all for your contributions, > > Sorry I know I’m late, but was there any positive feedback? > > > I have now modified the cave entrance page accordingly to make clear that > > this is the entrance object, i.e. > > name should be the name of the entrance > > cave:name of the cave it leads to > > I understand your intention to remove the inconsistent semantics in cave:ref > vs name. But redefining a name tag that is already widespread used (22k > objects) is tricky. I would suspect that many cave entrances have no specific > names, particularly small caves with just one access. > > So we should propose that cave:name is rendered in OSM-carto and considered > in Nominatim. And somehow we have to re-tag the old „name" to „cave:name“ in > an automated edit - dangerous ground ;)
16477 of natural=cave_entrance + name out there. Redefining the meaning of name at this point might not be a good idea. Perhaps leave name alone and add cave:name and cave_entry:name in cases where clarification is needed? Btw the page says cave_entrance is "approved". Does anyone have a link to the approved proposal.. can't find it? Regarding "ref", consider this edit: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:natural%3Dcave_entrance&diff=1147798&oldid=1134436 Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
