Martin, are you suggesting to drop the convention for the way direction
that it goes with the flow? Or are you OK with oneway=reverse? 

//colin

On 2016-09-17 23:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

> sent from a phone 
> 
> Il giorno 17 set 2016, alle ore 14:20, Andy Townsend <[email protected]> ha 
> scritto:
> 
>> I've certainly used "oneway=yes" on inland waterways to document signed 
>> traffic flow control, so a blanket removal would make no sense.
> 
> +1, this is the meaning of the oneway tag on waterways, don't remove it 
> unless it's wrong  
> 
> cheers, 
> Martin  
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to