Not really. Although such a move appeals to my sense of orderliness and my background in database design. All these weird variations in tag values drive me a little bit crazy but normalizing them is a lot of work that will soon be undermined by people using new free-form source tags anyhow. By the way, I use source=Bing with a capital B.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > One mapper has taken on themselves to 'harmonise' some local source tag > values. > > > There are many more that could be done along the same lines .. the major > example would be Bing, bing, BING, bing yyyy and bing yyyy mm (where yyyy > is the numerical year and mm is the numerical month). > > These could all be harmonised to source=Bing (the a majority of tags carry > this) with source:date=yyyy mm as appropriate. > > But I would see no point in it. I think people will continue to use there > present source tagging practices ... I use lower case bing for example and > see no real reason to change. > > > > Are there any who see advantages to this 'harmonisation' ? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
